PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) TERHADAP KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA

Berliance Zamira Zebua, Ellis Mardiana Panggabean, Tutiarny Naibaho

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran Pendidikan Matematika Realistik (PMR) terhadap kemandirian belajar siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi
eksperimen dengan desain pretes-postes kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah: (1) lembar validasi dan (2) angket kemandirian belajar siswa. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah: (1) skor kemandirian belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran PMR berada pada kategori baik; (2) terdapat perbedaan signifikan skor kemandirian belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran PMR dengan pembelajaran langsung; (3) skor kemandirian belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran PMR lebih baik daripada skor kemandirian belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan pembelajaran langsung; dan (4) penerapan model pembelajaran PMR dapat meningkatkan kemandirian belajar siswa.
Kata kunci: quasi eksperimen, model pembelajaran PMR, kemandirian belajar

References


Budinski, N. & Milinkovic, D. 2017. Transition

from Realistic to Real World Problems

with The Use of Technology in

Elementary Mathematical Education.

Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(1).

Carpenter, J. & Gorg, S. 2000. Principles and

Standards for School Mathematics. USA:

NCTM, Inc.

Eliserio, D. 2012. Self-Regulated Learning and

Mathematics Achievement in a Fourth

Grade Classroom. Master of Education

Program Theses, 27.

Ernest, P. 1991. The Philosophy of Mathematics

Education. Taylor & Francis Group:

Routledge Falmer.

Freudenthal, H. 1991. Revisiting Mathematics

Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

Publishers.

Gillies, R. M. 2014. Cooperative Learning:

Developments in Research. IJEP –

International Journal of Educational

Psychology, 3(2):125– 140.

Hake, R. R. 2008. Design-Based Research in

Physics Education: A Review. In A. E.

Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek.

Handbook of Design Research Methods in

Education: Innovations in Science,

Technology, Engineering, and

Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp.

–508). New York: Routledge, Taylor

& Francis.

Hasratuddin. 2017. Improving Critical Thinking

and Emotional Intelligence Capabilities of

Secondary School Students Through

Realistic Mathematics Education

Approach. International Journal of

Innovation in Science and Mathematics,

(1).

Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. van den. 2003. The

Didactical Use of Models in Realistic

Mathematics Education: An Example

From a Longitudinal Trajectory on

Percentage. Educational Studies in

Mathematics, 54:9–35.

Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. van den & Drijvers, P.

Realistic Mathematics Education.

In S. Lerman (Ed). 2014. Encyclopedia of

Mathematics Education (pp. 521–525).

Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business

Media.

Jupri, A. & Drijvers, P. 2016. Student Difficulties

in Mathematizing Word Problems in

Algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,

Science & Technology Education,

(9):2481–2502.

Laal, M.; Geranpaye, L.; & Daemi, M. 2013.

Individual Accountability in

Collaborative Learning. Procedia – Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 93:286–289.

Lange, Jan de. 1987. Mathematics, Insight, and

Meaning. The Netherlands, Utrecht: OW

& OC.

Lange, Jan de. 1996. Using and Applying

Mathematics in Education. In A. J.

Bishop; K. Clements; C. Keitel; J.

Kilpatrick; & C. Laborde (Eds).

International Handbook of Mathematics

Education (pp.49–97). The Netherlands:

Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Moor, E. de. (1994). Geometry Instruction in the

Netherlands – The Realistic Approach. In

Streefland, Leen (Ed.). Realistic

Mathematics Education in Primary

School (pp.119–139). Freudenthal

Institute: Utrecht.

Mullis, I. V. S. & Martin, M. O. (Eds). 2013.

TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks.

United States: International Association

for the Evaluation of Educational

Achievement (IEA).

Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). 2012.

Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning:

Theory, Research, and Applications.

Routledge.

Schunk, D. H. 2005. Self-Regulated Learning:

The educational legacy of Paul R.

Pintrich. Educational Psychologist,

:85–94.

Slavin, R. E. 2008. Cooperative Learning, Success

for All, and Evidence-Based Reform in

Education. Education & Didactique, 2(2):

–159.

Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in Realistic

Mathematics Education: A Paradigm of

Developmental Research. Netherlands:

Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Surya, E. & Syahputra, E. 2017. Improving High

– Level Thinking Skills by Development

of Learning PBL Approach on the

Learning Mathematics for Senior High

School Students. International Education

Studies, 10(8).

Treffers, A. 1987. Three Dimensions: A Model of

Goal and Theory Description in

Mathematics Instruction - The Wiskobas

Project. DordrechtHolland: D. Reidel

Publishing Company. Treffers, A. 1993.

Wiskobas Freudenthal Realistic

Mathematics Education. Educational

Studies in Mathematics, 25:21–49.

Widjaja, Y. B. & Heck, A. 2003. How a Realistic

Mathematics Education Approach and

Microcomputer – Based Laboratory

Worked in Lessons on Graphing at an

Indonesian Junior High School. Journal of

Science and Mathematics Education in

Southeast Asia, 26(2):1–51




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32696/jmn.v8i2.611

JURNAL MATHEDUCATION NUSANTARA ISSN : 2614-512X (Print) ISSN : 2614-5138 (Online) Published by Program Pascasarjana UMN Al Washliyah